My ember.js app uses an in-repo mountable engine called user-backoffice
.
This engine provides a route called my-engine-route
, and here is the unit test for it, located at my-app/lib/user-backoffice/test-support/unit/my-engine-route/route-test.js
import { module, test } from 'qunit';
import { setupTest } from 'ember-qunit';
import engineResolverFor from 'ember-engines/test-support/engine-resolver-for';
const modulePrefix = 'user-backoffice';
const resolver = engineResolverFor(modulePrefix);
module('[user-backoffice] Unit | Route | my-engine-route', function(hooks) {
setupTest(hooks, {resolver});
test('it exists', function(assert) {
let route = this.owner.lookup('route:my-engine-route');
assert.ok(route);
});
});
The engineResolverFor
part is taken from the ember-engine.com docs.
My problem is that this code generates an eslint error because of the ember/no-restricted-resolver-tests rule.
my-app/lib/user-backoffice/test-support/test-support/unit/my-engine-route/route-test.js
9:20 error Do not use setupTest whose last parameter is an object unless used in conjunction with `integration: true` ember/no-restricted-resolver-tests
In my opinion, the eslint rule and the ember-engine docs are in contradiction, so I'd like to know if the rule should be disabled in an engine's context, or if the ember-engine.com docs should be updated.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire